From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 17 10:07:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005A16A4CE
	for <acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:07:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D48A43D55
	for <acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:07:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org)
Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim)
	id 1D1iYe-0001bF-00; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:06:52 +0100
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:06:52 +0100
To: Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@telia.com>
Message-ID: <20050217100652.GS1145@poupinou.org>
References: <4213F066.2050708@root.org> <4214119B.2010909@telia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4214119B.2010909@telia.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>
cc: acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: patch: p4tcc and speedstep cpufreq drivers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:07:18 -0000

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 04:38:03AM +0100, Pawel Worach wrote:
>   Only cpufreq loaded at boot:
> +est0: <Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control> on cpu0
> +p4tcc0: <CPU Frequency Thermal Control> on cpu0
> +ichss: enabling SpeedStep support
> +ichss0: <SpeedStep ICH> on cpu0

est0 and ichss0?  I doubt this work.  I'm afraid there is something
wrong there.


-- 
Bruno Ducrot

--  Which is worse:  ignorance or apathy?
--  Don't know.  Don't care.