From owner-freebsd-lite2 Fri Sep 20 04:47:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-lite2 Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA23615 for lite2-outgoing; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 04:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from minnow.render.com (render.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.118]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA23187 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 04:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from minnow.render.com (minnow.render.com [193.195.178.1]) by minnow.render.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA04860; Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:42:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 12:42:41 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Peter Wemm cc: freebsd-lite2@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_lock.c src/sys/sys lock.h In-Reply-To: <199609190806.QAA25561@spinner.DIALix.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-lite2@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, Peter Wemm wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > > peter 96/09/19 00:59:42 > > > > Removed: sys/kern kern_lock.c > > sys/sys lock.h > > Log: > > remove from HEAD, this is now in the LITE2 branch > > The LITE2 branch should now be in a suitable condition for Doug's NFS work > to be committed to the branch. > > Doug? Is this convenient for you with the LITE2 tree being a week or two > old? Should I resync with -current first? The current state of the LITE2 tree is fine. We should merge in -current again later but at the moment, I prefer stability :-). -- Doug Rabson, Microsoft RenderMorphics Ltd. Mail: dfr@render.com Phone: +44 171 734 3761 FAX: +44 171 734 6426