From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jun 15  6:26:23 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5D4155D3
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 06:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA36574;
	Tue, 15 Jun 1999 15:26:03 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: umapfs...
References: <199906142113.RAA20328@cs.rpi.edu>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 15 Jun 1999 15:26:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: "David E. Cross"'s message of "Mon, 14 Jun 1999 17:13:38 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzpvhcpegt0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu> writes:
> I have been looking at the code for UMAPfs... I am trying to understand 
> conceptually why it is so unstable...

You're looking in the wrong place. It's unstable because of
infrastructure problems which require fairly substantial amounts of
work to correct.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message