From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 10 19:42:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4C91065672;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7468D8FC15;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:42:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C213E62E9;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:42:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 8AFE98A51; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:42:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <50450F2A.10708@FreeBSD.org> <20120903203505.GN1464@x96.org>
	<50451D6E.30401@FreeBSD.org> <20120903214638.GO1464@x96.org>
	<50453686.9090100@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120904220754.GA3643@server.rulingia.com>
	<20120906174247.GB13179@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<20120906230157.5307a21f@gumby.homeunix.com>
	<20120906224703.GD89120@x96.org>
	<20120907015157.GA29497@server.rulingia.com>
	<20120910135218.GA68128@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<504E343A.4020802@FreeBSD.org> <86pq5tu1zr.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<504E3DAB.3090000@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:42:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <504E3DAB.3090000@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Mon, 10
	Sep 2012 12:21:15 -0700")
Message-ID: <86fw6pu0l0.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Arthur Mesh <arthurmesh@gmail.com>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-security@freebsd.org, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>,
	Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r239569 - head/etc/rc.d
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:42:04 -0000

Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> If the problem with replay attacks is as bad as Arthur suggest it is,
> it should be visible in far less than a million tries.

I was exaggerating a bit - but my reasoning was that since it hasn't
blown up in our faces yet, it's probably subtle enough to require a
large number of samples.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no