Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 20:02:47 +0200 From: Alex Shnitman <alexsh@hectic.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tunneling w/ FreeBSD & Linux: Solution Message-ID: <19991016200247.B17756@hectic.net> In-Reply-To: <19991014103603.B44643@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>; from Ruslan Ermilov on Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 10:36:03AM %2B0300 References: <19991014010105.A5666@hectic.net> <19991014103603.B44643@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, FWIW, here's the solution I found to the problem of FreeBSD & Linux-compatible IPIP tunneling. Ruslan (thanks!) pointed me to nos-tun, and it indeed does that, except that I had to change the IP protocol number it uses from 94 to 4 in the source and recompile it. After that it works flawlessly. Perhaps the protocol number needs to be made configurable? Should I submit a patch to make it a command-line option? (I.e. will it be accepted or I shouldn't bother)? -- Alex Shnitman | http://www.debian.org alexsh@hectic.net, alexsh@linux.org.il +----------------------- http://alexsh.hectic.net UIN 188956 PGP key on web page E1 F2 7B 6C A0 31 80 28 63 B8 02 BA 65 C7 8B BA Linux and other Open Source advocates are making a progressively more credible argument that Open Source software is at least as robust -- if not more -- than commercial alternatives. The Internet provides an ideal, high-visibility showcase for the Open Source world. -- Internal Microsoft memo [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBOAi9xlb2jADsXWGdAQH9wgP+Jt/uLxMOvLl43Oy5Dtm3GnpSrReZ6VeF PcVdMzBNNLHiPcBFIcI5VLnn5T5nyDmXagsKbDBt05CbLFv03OGgRskkgp1FRj/C ZR4jqH0fV5vgdU0INtVf5SzAcfmXxrXPBNEd+YTVJUzRKk7jJKf2E3pfeIdOsytG MsNP0fJd98E= =QNGa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991016200247.B17756>