From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 01:48:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B8C16A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:48:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-13-97.w80-11.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.11.65.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA2243FE1 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 01:48:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from freebsd (modem214.metz.imaginet.fr [195.68.12.214] (may be forged)) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAR9jGVc008178; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:45:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: Kris Kennaway Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:49:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311271012.21305.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20031127092822.GA63927@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031127092822.GA63927@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311271049.38934.ajacoutot@lphp.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: poor NFS performance in 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:48:39 -0000 On Thursday 27 November 2003 10:28, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Try reading the basic documentation that comes with 5.2-BETA, for > example the /usr/src/UPDATING file, which tells you clearly that > performance is not expected to be good unless you disable the standard I've been running CURRENT on test boxes for months, I know that and this is not the problem, I have my own compiled kernel without debugging options set.