Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:36:29 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>, dougb@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/90070: [MAINTAINER] mail/rabl_server: per sougb request, use "new style" RC script Message-ID: <1134131789.28991.24.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20051209143235.79632f96@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200512090922.jB99MYbH094744@freefall.freebsd.org> <20051209143235.79632f96@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Synopsis: [MAINTAINER] mail/rabl_server: per sougb request, use "new
> > style" RC script
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> > State-Changed-By: pav
> > State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 9 09:22:05 GMT 2005
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > Why would you want to do this? USE_RC_SUBR is somehow deficient with
> > new rcNG infrastructure in recent -CURRENT?
>
> Posted on ports@ (Subject: USE_RC_SUBR and local_startup scripts in the
> base rcorder), waited a few days to be told if I'm a stupid or a
> genius :), no replies, assumed I'm right, so start sending prs.
>
> USE_RC_SUBR basically does 2 things:
> - performs substitutions on ${USE_RC_SUBR}
> - installs the files in ${USE_RC_SUBR} with .sh extension
> So even if you have files/rc_script.in besides files/rc_script.sh.in
> (so that the substitutions can be performed) it will be installed
> with .sh extension.
And with new dougb's rcNG, rc scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d now must be
without .sh extension?
This is absolutely something that must be fixed in the infrastructure,
not in every port over and over again.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Me go and see Elves and all! Hooray!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1134131789.28991.24.camel>