From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 19 16:19:26 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667ED106564A
	for <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:19:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe02.c2i.net [212.247.154.34])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E496E8FC08
	for <freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:19:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=yevn+QCjI6xy199BDvBOOiO14qYvyLq62he9tTtU3M8=
	c=1 sm=1 a=Dyoqhi_TatcA:10 a=Az84e6_TBBoA:10 a=Cfj4BQAnxiAA:10
	a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17
	a=uiEJq9c6V-77wL5lJw4A:9 a=6nN2yKmZUWJc456s0lQxGNvQmWsA:4
	a=Ft8UYL4EG9YA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117
Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
	laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org)
	by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19)
	with ESMTPA id 51338368; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:19:23 +0100
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:20:15 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; )
References: <441397602.20101119185527@serebryakov.spb.ru>
In-Reply-To: <441397602.20101119185527@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Face: +~\`s("[*<S!NI[0M*"FaghA8S>|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA:
	hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR
	Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L'
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201011191720.15402.hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
Subject: Re: Two questions: how to specify module-load function for driver
	module and which name of driver is better (according to "standards")
X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB <freebsd-usb.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-usb@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb>,
	<mailto:freebsd-usb-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:19:26 -0000

On Friday 19 November 2010 16:55:27 Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-usb.
> 
>   I've  implemented  driver (ucom-subdriver) for MosChip 7820 and 7840
>  USB2COM multiport bridges. I have two questions:
> 

Hi,

>   (1)  How  should  I  specify  module-load  function? DRIVER_MODULE()
>   doesn't   help   much.  I  need  to run some code only once, at very
>   beginning,  not  for each probe/attach. GEOM modules have methods for
>   it, but I can not find such methods for drivers.

Look at ubt_modevent in sys/netgraph/bluetooth/drivers/ubt/ng_ubt.c. Or use a 
so-called SYSINIT() or SYSUNINIT().

> 
>   (2) Which name should I choose? Working name of module/driver/device
>   is "mos7840", but it seems, that it is bad name:
>    (a) All existing ucom-based drivers is "uXXXcom"
>    (b) Driver instances looks ugly (like "mos78400")
umos78400 ?

> 
>   Is  "umos7840com"  good name or it is too long? :) We have "umoscom"
>   driver for older MosChip chip in base already.

Maybe someone else has some comments.

--HPS