From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 11 01:35:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 408CC37B401; Sun, 11 May 2003 01:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ED79043FCB; Sun, 11 May 2003 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4B8ZXUf086065;
	Sun, 11 May 2003 12:35:34 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 12:35:33 +0400 (MSD)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030510213104.GM385@freebsdmall.com>
Message-ID: <20030511123503.F85945@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <200305090941.h499fIYD040015@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20030510213104.GM385@freebsdmall.com>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh print-cdrom-packages.sh
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 08:35:37 -0000

On Sat, 10 May 2003, Murray Stokely wrote:

MS> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:33:28PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
MS> > BTW, most CDR/CDRW vendors now provide mostly (some vendors -- only) 80-mins
MS> > (700 Mb) disks. There are virtually no hardware which is unable to read
MS> > them. Don't you think it's time to extend disc1 a bit?
MS>
MS> No that would be a support nightmare.  "most" is not nearly enough
MS> here, especially for only 50 extra megabytes.  I think you're missing
MS> a word in your second sentece ("new"?), since there most certainly is
MS> a lot of older hardware unable to read these discs.

After a bit of thinking, totally agreed. Thanks for attention ;-)

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------