From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 19:12:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B038116A469 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7784B13C448 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l58J7iCJ090126; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:07:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id l58J7ikc090125; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:07:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:07:44 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "illoai@gmail.com" Message-ID: <20070608190744.GB90077@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <294439d20706081139l241ec4b6p83347ccb9d5847bc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Amarendra Godbole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 19:12:32 -0000 On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:57:40PM -0500, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 08/06/07, Amarendra Godbole wrote: > . . . > >Initially I had about 230 packages installed, and after the upgrade > >the number has gone up to 450! Lot of these seem to be X related > >packages. > > > >Does xorg 7.2 have more dependencies, and hence so many ports were > >installed? > > xorg is now 180-230 some-odd tiny packages (ports) > instead of the old -clients, -server, -libraries blobs. > > It seems to work okay, and minor updates are far less > strenuous. I give it five years to either prove itself or > all the developers to go mad and sacrifice their firstborn > in some wicked ritual to the sun-god. > > Failure or not, the "modularity" will be adopted by microsoft > sometime around 2013, who will announce it as "The First > Commercial Product to Use a Wholley Modular Codebase" > except they won't spell "Wholley" with as much style. In MS case, I would expect them to spell it 'holey' and introduce some special incantations to be used with prescribed incense. ////jerry > > I just hope we aren't still putting up with people using "impact" > all the time, by then. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"