From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Mar 28 23:58:23 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECD4F56716 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F35F6A56C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E9801C62B for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2SNwMh6077230 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2SNwMD6077229 for freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226841] sysutils/dupd: update to version 1.6 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tom@hur.st X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 23:58:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226841 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Hurst --- > What is 'bfd' in this context? GNU ld, basically. It uses GNU's Binary File Descriptor library, so I guess ld.bdf makes more sense than ld.gnu. *shrug*. > The GITHASH definition is harmless even if git not present. The value > is only ever used in development builds, so because this port build is > meant for release builds, it it irrelevant. It is safe to patch it out > as before, but see above on minimizing patches. OK. I mainly patched it out because I don't like seeing spurious "command = not found" errors in my build logs - it's one more thing to remember to ignore = when testing a port and one more thing for users to get worried over ("why is th= is giving me fatal git errors during build?!"). If the Makefile set it conditionally it'd be easy to disable just by passin= g in a definition to override it. > The -m64 flag is unnecessary. However, I don't know if it'll work > correctly as a 32bit build. I have not tried that in many > releases/years. Is that important for FreeBSD's needs? If it only supports certain architectures it should be set ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= =3D, but I'd rather only do that if it's specifically known- broken. Luckily there = is a test suite :) Either way, it's blatting ports-provided CFLAGS, which is to be avoided: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/book.html#dads-cfla= gs > As to the objcopy/ld line, I'll look into a way to make this more > flexible in a way that meets the needs on all platforms. That'd be for > next release, so I guess you can retain that patch for this time. How about: system("man dupd"); ;) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=