From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Jul 2 12:18:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6282715D1AC3; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay108.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay108.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155D08332A; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 12:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2A8AAA4Shtd/1H1sVtlGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBVQMBAQEBCwGCFlliIRIUFIQciHuJeAEBgg41AYoQjiyBewk?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQIBAQEBATcBAYRAAoIVJjYHDgEDAQEFAQEBAQVtikOFSwEFIzMjEAsYAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?FIQICD0gGExuFFqR3gTKJLYEQgQwoAYt1gX+EIz6ERIMKglgEqjUJghiTcSe?= =?us-ascii?q?XbIQRokkJKIFYTTAIgyeCTReOIz0DMI53AQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2A8AAA4Shtd/1H1sVtlGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBV?= =?us-ascii?q?QMBAQEBCwGCFlliIRIUFIQciHuJeAEBgg41AYoQjiyBewkBAQIBAQEBATcBA?= =?us-ascii?q?YRAAoIVJjYHDgEDAQEFAQEBAQVtikOFSwEFIzMjEAsYAgIFIQICD0gGExuFF?= =?us-ascii?q?qR3gTKJLYEQgQwoAYt1gX+EIz6ERIMKglgEqjUJghiTcSeXbIQRokkJKIFYT?= =?us-ascii?q?TAIgyeCTReOIz0DMI53AQE?= Received: from 81.245-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.245.81]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2019 14:17:57 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x62CHuti013308; Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:17:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 14:17:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head Subject: Re: svn commit: r504590 - in head/net: samba46 samba47 samba48 Message-ID: <20190702141756.1f0b14b7@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201906192240.x5JMequU017187@repo.freebsd.org> <20190628070305.eim4o3d77iyti5d5@ivaldir.net> <20190629160445.051f2426@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 155D08332A X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.89 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.903,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5432, ipnet:195.238.0.0/19, country:BE] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 12:18:07 -0000 On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 01:23:34 +0200 "Timur I. Bakeyev" wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 at 22:50, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Le 29 juin 2019 20:40:53 GMT+02:00, "Timur I. Bakeyev" a >> =C3=A9crit : >>> Tonight I hope to commit 4.10 port. >> >> It does not solve rhe pb, staying on the legacy libs is the solution, as= I >> said even fedora is on the legacy >> > I've committed net/samba410. >=20 > My view on the situation is that all the ports, which use > devel/{talloc,tevent}, databases/tdb should keep > using them, unless they are broken by using them(but that shouldn't happe= n, > API still should remain > the same. The biggest difference is the drop of the dependency on Python2= 7, > as far as I can see. >=20 > New Samba port doesn't use external databases/ldb*, so security/sssd may > use any of those freely now. >=20 > The samba4[47] are outdated and should disappear in the middle of the > August. >=20 > The samba48 will remain for a while, but not for long, as samba411 us > pushing from behind. It'll be (hopefully) > the only consumer of the talloc1/tevent1/tdb1 ports, which should disappe= ar > together with Samba 4.8. >=20 > In general I'd prefer to see SAMBA_DEFAULT to be bumped to 410, but this = is > up to the portmgr. 4.8 goes EoL upstream mid-September (about 2 weeks before Q4), so making 4.10 now would be good, but I believe it's just too late for that. A port like this needs at least a few weeks of wider testing before it can be pushed to users of the quarterly branches who expect more stability. Since you said that the new libs are API compatible, is it possible to make 4.8 use the new libs? If not, then all non-samba consumers will have to switch to the legacy libs. They can be switched back after the 2019Q3 branch has been created (together with making 4.10 the default which probably needs an exp-run).