From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Apr 24 02:40:06 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA28922
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 24 Apr 1995 02:40:06 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA28916
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 1995 02:40:03 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id CAA01126; Mon, 24 Apr 1995 02:39:43 -0700
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 02:39:43 -0700
Message-Id: <199504240939.CAA01126@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199504240915.LAA22926@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> (message from Thomas Gellekum on Mon, 24 Apr 1995 11:15:47 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject: Re: Let's compress our manpages!
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * While we're at it: ports should not be compiled with -g. They're
 * supposed to work, after all. Developers know enough to turn -g on
 * again if they need it, for the users it just means (much) bigger
 * binaries.

Yes!  Yes!  Yes!  People, please take out the "-g"'s!

Satoshi