From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 19:08:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C4A16A6A9 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA3413C45B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kobe.laptop (dialup89.ach.sch.gr [81.186.70.89]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id lAOJ7ddQ006481 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:07:54 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lAOJ7ddn005692; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:07:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lAOJ7bl3005691; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:07:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:07:37 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071124190736.GB3162@kobe.laptop> References: <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F06468CE8@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> <7FA9B777A6FFF4225817FE48@[172.16.1.36]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-3.942, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.46, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: top posting (off-topic) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:08:13 -0000 On 2007-11-23 21:58, David Kelly wrote: >On Nov 22, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> Understood from that perspective, perhaps you can see why people >> might dislike top posting. > > Many here (and elsewhere) will not reply to a top-poster. I am one of these people. If I see a top-posted message -- totally incomprehensible, full of errors, misformattings, and other annoying bits, including mutilated quotes with completely messed up quoting, and semi-randomly wrapped text -- then it instantly rings a very important bell: "The author of this message does not care enough to put some effort into writing a properly formatted, readable reply. If he doesn't care enough to make his message readable, do you really want to spend the effort to _read_ it?" The answer is, surprisingly often, "No, I don't think I want to do that".