From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Sep  4 13:57:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA22577
          for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 13:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.san.rr.com (mail-atm.san.rr.com [204.210.0.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA22565
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 1997 13:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by mail.san.rr.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA11205;
	Thu, 4 Sep 1997 13:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709042057.NAA11205@mail.san.rr.com>
Received: from dt5h1n61.san.rr.com(204.210.31.97) by mail via smap (V2.0)
	id xma011088; Thu, 4 Sep 97 13:56:49 -0700
From: "Studded" <Studded@dal.net>
To: "Kerry.Morse@metro.tas.gov.au" <Kerry.Morse@metro.tas.gov.au>
Cc: "freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 97 13:56:44 -0700
Reply-To: "Studded" <Studded@dal.net>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 1.92 For OS/2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: kern/4463: When using ipfw, all I get is the following error "setsockopt failed"
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 4 Sep 1997 00:02:25 -0700 (PDT), Kerry.Morse@metro.tas.gov.au
wrote:

>With the IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE kernel option compiled in on both the 3.0 
>and 2.2 kernel's ipfw allows respond's with the above message...
>running the rc.firewall code falls every time...

	Did you actually include the IPFIREWALL option?  This is what
actually enables the option, the verbose option is related to logging. 
And depending on whether you are trying to us divert sockets or not, you
probably need the IPDIVERT option.

Good luck,

Doug

Do thou amend thy face,
	and I'll amend my life.
-Shakespeare, "Henry V"