From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 18:26:23 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FAA1065680;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de)
Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2C58FC65;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2010 18:25:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [195.4.92.14] (helo=4.mx.freenet.de)
	by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port
	25) (Exim 4.72 #1)
	id 1Np47I-0003tU-J9; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:25:16 +0100
Received: from p57ae211e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.33.30]:37842
	helo=ernst.jennejohn.org)
	by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25)
	(Exim 4.72 #2) id 1Np47H-0008WE-Lj; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:25:15 +0100
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:25:14 +0100
From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>
To: Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20100309192514.49a88a53@ernst.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
References: <47B3280E-2609-476D-92EA-BC940C8C49D3@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports with same name
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:26:23 -0000

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:23:51 -0500
Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Hello-
> 
> As documented in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/144277
> we have two ports with the same name:
> 
> Port:	gag-2.9
> Path:	/usr/ports/security/gag
> Info:	A stacheldraht (DOS attack) agent detector
> Maint:	ports@FreeBSD.org
> B-deps:	
> R-deps:	
> WWW:	http://www.washington.edu/People/dad/
> 
> Port:	gag-4.9
> Path:	/usr/ports/sysutils/gag
> Info:	Graphical Boot Manager
> Maint:	alepulver@FreeBSD.org
> B-deps:	
> R-deps:	
> WWW:	http://gag.sourceforge.net/
> 
> I am looking for some advice on whats the best course of action to deal with this.
> 
> My gut feeling is that sysutils/gag should remain the same and that security/gag should be
> renamed to security/gag-stacheldraht.
> 
> Anyone vehemently opposed to this?
> 

So where's the problem?  sysutils/gag doesn't seem to install a binary
which would conflict with security/gag.  In fact, it doesn't seem to
install an executable at all, based on examining the Makefile and
pkg-plist.

---
Gary Jennejohn