From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 18 18: 6:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484BB37B4C5 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA05860; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200010190106.VAA05860@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce Evans Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included. In-Reply-To: References: <200010160129.e9G1TA321182@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > It is strictly correct for POSIX.1-1990, but FreeBSD-2 never had the > requirement until now. POSIX.1-200x is relaxing similar requirements > (I'm not sure about this one), so it is too late to start enforcing it. Yes. All POSIX headers which are defined to use specific foo_t types are (will be) defined to declare those types as well. This reflects SUSv2 behavior which was imported into the new POSIX. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message