Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 21:06:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more endian.h breakage; patch included. Message-ID: <200010190106.VAA05860@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161616220.2454-100000@besplex.bde.org> References: <200010160129.e9G1TA321182@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161616220.2454-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:23:43 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> said: > It is strictly correct for POSIX.1-1990, but FreeBSD-2 never had the > requirement until now. POSIX.1-200x is relaxing similar requirements > (I'm not sure about this one), so it is too late to start enforcing it. Yes. All POSIX headers which are defined to use specific foo_t types are (will be) defined to declare those types as well. This reflects SUSv2 behavior which was imported into the new POSIX. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010190106.VAA05860>