Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 12:06:12 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@gmail.com>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mesa-dri uses llvm60 Message-ID: <23610.7812.126702.796595@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BStXTJgwNcp%2BANpW6WZN0sq9E8yqEpr3MAUTAQL3g0iKtw@mail.gmail.com> References: <23609.9020.600859.127925@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112101010.2ebfb955@ernst.home> <23609.58491.10199.676646@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CAPS9%2BStGXBokDFG38kW26xbux4vW8Aa=_W_POYD9RfPe_WufSw@mail.gmail.com> <23609.60774.88807.167712@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112150932.6a70784b@ernst.home> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1901121108520.13279@sea.ntplx.net> <CAPS9%2BStXTJgwNcp%2BANpW6WZN0sq9E8yqEpr3MAUTAQL3g0iKtw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Nilsson writes: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 5:25 PM Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Just thinking out loud, can the missing llvm bits be a port, > > such that building the missing pieces use what's already > > in base? > > It probably could, at least technically. But it would probably not > be a good idea, having some bits in / and some bits in > /usr/local. Also, if a newer mesa-dri would depend on a newer llvm > than whats in base, that would prohibit any update to mesa-dri. Could it be an _optional_ part of base, perhaps controlled by "WITH_LLVM_EXTRAS=yes" in src.conf? Curiously, Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23610.7812.126702.796595>