Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 12:34:38 -0700 From: Matt Olander <matt@offmyserver.com> To: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows Message-ID: <20030621123438.D41990@knight.ixsystems.net> In-Reply-To: <20030621164515.GA7088@daemon.li>; from j.el-rayes@daemon.li on Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 06:45:15PM %2B0200 References: <002201c33812$5b881e80$c601a8c0@starfly> <20030621164515.GA7088@daemon.li>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 06:45:15PM +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > although i find this quite nice it seems to be a bit too much of > pro-freebsd. it also needs some updating. linux has got a journaling > filesystem, ext2 is not the choice anymore. commercial support is better > for linux than for freebsd. i also think that linux has usually a better > device driver support, or put it this way, a broader variety. it's definitely pro-freebsd ;) > so after some modifing, to make it more objective, this article would be very nice. > but thats just my opinion. yes, absolutely correct. freebsd has made a bit of progress too. I'll post a link to an updated version if Murray and I do one. hrm...maybe I'll find an unbiased Linux person for input. -matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030621123438.D41990>