From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 3 21:09:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0394E10656D5; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF768FC08; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n73L5nmq031970; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:05:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:06:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20090803.150637.-861030402.imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <86skg84o8i.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <8663d463d7.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090803.144515.-924279425.imp@bsdimp.com> <86skg84o8i.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:56:18 +0000 Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, brde@optusnet.com.au, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, alfred@freebsd.org, hselasky@c2i.net, rwatson@freebsd.org, nparhar@gmail.com, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, sam@errno.com Subject: Re: svn commit: r195960 - in head/sys/dev/usb: . controller input X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:09:27 -0000 In message: <86skg84o8i.fsf@ds4.des.no> Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav writes: : "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > Does the patch that Hans posted fit the bill? To my eye I think it= : > does, but I've not tested to see if it works... : = : My point (and Sam's, I think) is simply: drop keyboard repeat support= .= And my point is that we have a patch that will work now. We should go with it. If it turns out not to work, 86 repeat support. Warner