From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 21:22:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7299990 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from keltia.net (cl-90.mrs-01.fr.sixxs.net [IPv6:2a01:240:fe00:59::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3723ABFC for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lonrach.local (foret.keltia.net [78.232.116.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96108529E for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 23:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 23:21:51 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hammer fs Message-ID: <20141025212150.GA23731@lonrach.local> References: <20141023223457.GA29206@bsdjunk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141023223457.GA29206@bsdjunk.com> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / MBP 4,1 - FreeBSD 8.0 / T3500-E5520 Nehalem User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:22:14 -0000 According to Christopher Petrik: > One way to improve FreeBSD is looking at the ideas page and act upon it, ive used dragonfly and decided it is time to improve my c skills by porting hammer to FreeBSD. This will be a very time consumiung process which will take time. However it would be nice to have this option during install since it brings in some nice features. Be aware that the DFly VFS layer is very different from the FreeBSD one which means that either will need big changes to support the other. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/