From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 11 18:12:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9746C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grover.logicsquad.net (ppp34-103.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 723A843D5A for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:12:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulh@logicsquad.net) Received: (qmail 72660 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Apr 2004 01:12:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:42:08 +0930 From: "Paul A. Hoadley" To: "Gary W. Swearingen" Message-ID: <20040412011208.GG92584@grover.logicsquad.net> References: <20040410074515.GS85168@grover.logicsquad.net> <20040410084629.GB8301@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040410102653.GA92584@grover.logicsquad.net> <20040411013632.GC92584@grover.logicsquad.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL: implications for FreeBSD-on-hardware for sale? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:12:13 -0000 --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 07:58:15AM -0700, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: > "Paul A. Hoadley" writes: >=20 > > Maybe some more specifics would be helpful. The application is a > > web application. It may or may not end up open source, but it > > will be for sale, and I don't want it to inherit a restrictive > > license. >=20 > Even BSD licenses are restrictive, By restrictive, I mean a license that forces itself onto other code, whether by way of the other code being a derivative work, using the licensed code, or just sitting on the same distribution medium. The main issue here is simply that I don't _necessarily_ want to distribute source code to the application. (Of course, if the code remains largely PHP, I'll essentially be doing that anyway.) I don't want the decision to be pre-made just by interacting with other software. --=20 Paul. mailto:paulh@logicsquad.net --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAeezn730Z/jysbzIRAj0zAKCCtfnZN1jNiW4KrTzyNIgRRUsuXQCdEmSD wqonxbRFi8nxf7s7WhdYZhQ= =yYxv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8--