Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:44:17 -0500
From:      Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com>
To:        krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: gjournal and TRIM: A safe combination?
Message-ID:  <86pp081glq.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyfg-71nCg4K0dKmUK-YmZ8yi0ppeGGv4WOD-2Mt8NP9HQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <867fmh12nq.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <CALfReyfg-71nCg4K0dKmUK-YmZ8yi0ppeGGv4WOD-2Mt8NP9HQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

krad writes:

> I thought SU+J was the preferred method these days, not gjournal. I quite
> out of touch with ufs these days though.
>

I thought the opposite, myself. `gjournal` has its own section in the
Handbook, while SU+J isn't even mentioned. I also thought there was
something fundamentally different about them--like SU+J simply maintains
filesystem integrity, while gjournal actually protects files from the
write hole as well as protecting the filesystem. I could be wrong.

-- 
=================================================================
   		      :: Brandon Wandersee ::
                  :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com ::
==================================================================
'A common mistake that people make when trying to design something
completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete
fools.'
                            			- Douglas Adams
==================================================================



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86pp081glq.fsf>