Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 19:51:21 GMT From: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/181035: [exp-run] Update libusb-1.0.pc to claim to be libusb 1.0.13 Message-ID: <201308041951.r74JpLmw034274@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201308042000.r74K01Lc034590@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 181035
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: [exp-run] Update libusb-1.0.pc to claim to be libusb 1.0.13
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sun Aug 04 20:00:01 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Ed Maste
>Release: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64
>Organization:
FreeBSD
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD freefall.freebsd.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r253323: Sat Jul 13 18:26:21 UTC 2013 peter@freefall.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEFALL amd64
>Description:
QEMU libusb host support needs at least libusbx-1.0.13. Our in-tree
libusb supports the required functionality, but claims to be 1.0.9.
I would like to see what, if anything, breaks by us claiming to
be 1.0.13.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
--- libusb-1.0.13.diff begins here ---
Index: lib/libusb/libusb-1.0.pc
===================================================================
--- lib/libusb/libusb-1.0.pc (revision 253936)
+++ lib/libusb/libusb-1.0.pc (working copy)
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@
Name: libusb-1.0
Description: Library that abstracts ways to access USB devices (v1.0)
-Version: 1.0.9
+Version: 1.0.13
Libs: -L${libdir} -lusb
Cflags: -I${includedir}
--- libusb-1.0.13.diff ends here ---
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201308041951.r74JpLmw034274>