From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 10 7:28:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pe4.eziba.com (mail.eziba.com [64.80.31.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A74637B408; Fri, 10 May 2002 07:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eziba.com (thelonius.eziba.com [192.168.0.31]) by pe4.eziba.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4AESfD15457; Fri, 10 May 2002 10:28:41 -0400 Message-ID: <3CDBD919.5000308@eziba.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:28:41 -0400 From: Jay Sachs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020506 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ernst de Haan Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review: Standardising Java library directory locations References: <200205101311.PAA08481@smtp.hccnet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ernst de Haan wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the following proposal for standardising Java library > installation directories: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~znerd/javalibdirs.html While it will work, it seems unfortunate to use directories with ',' characters in them (in the case that PORTEPOCH is defined). What motivates the need to support multiple instances of the same version of a port differing only by the "port epoch"? jay To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message