From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 7 03:08:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D0D16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:08:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54010.mail.yahoo.com (web54010.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B5BC43D3F for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 03:08:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041007030852.3255.qmail@web54010.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54010.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 20:08:52 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:08:52 -0700 (PDT) From: spam maps To: freebsd-current MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? Gzip kernel by default... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:08:53 -0000 Jose M Rodriguez said: > John Baldwin wrote >> Take care of: >> - it only takes ~2 MB of your rootfs. > > About a year ago a lot of people didn't want > /rescue because of a lack of space in some of the > older root slices. This would free up a little bit > of room from a lot of programs that are likely > duplicated in /rescue. Getting rid of /stand might > make a little difference. In support of these people, I'm often surprised that the kernel in /boot/kernel/kernel is not by default gzipped, which saves another ~1 Mb or so in my case, and probably similar in general case. Rob. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com