From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 17:03:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5B316A4CF for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:03:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xenial.mcc.ac.uk (xenial.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B9C43D58 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by xenial.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1CFy9W-0005Ip-00; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 18:03:34 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i98H3XYu041196; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:03:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i98H3X4q041195; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:03:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:03:32 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: Remko Lodder Message-ID: <20041008170332.GC19310@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20041005160132.GC73819@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20041005160744.GA57375@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041006115704.GA86967@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <4163F3EB.3030208@trini0.org> <4163F6AD.2000709@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4163F6AD.2000709@elvandar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: Gerard Samuel cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:03:35 -0000 On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:44:13PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: : Apart from that: Why do you actually want to know? It's better not to : know the exact version since others might abuse that information and : hack into the company. That does not feel right, well not with me :-). I was just wondering how they manage heavy loads. They could either stay on 4.x, move to SMP-supporting 5.x when stable, or just throw more hardware at it. :-) jm -- My other computer is your Windows box.