From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 11:29:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D1A16A41F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3C543D45 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F9CA3034; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:29:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 53D35657A; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:29:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:29:00 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: Max Khon Message-ID: <20051101112900.GA4903@stack.nl> References: <436116D3.908@samsco.org> <20051031151809.GA83253@stack.nl> <20051101004042.GA28233@samodelkin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051101004042.GA28233@samodelkin.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 6.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Marc Olzheim , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! 6.0-RELEASE coming X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:29:01 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:40:42AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > Linking against -lthr (or even -lc_r!) instead of -lpthread solves gdb > "The program no longer exists." problem for me on RELENG_6. Well, yes, but that's not the same. While running on M:N KSE, all sorts of locking needs to be correct, which with non M:N threading you can get away with some (intentional or not) sloppiness. So debugging a fully threaded program with a non M:N threadlib is not always useful. Marc --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDZ1F8ezjnobFOgrERAtrBAKCFkNVFlOymIfNiT1Hmp+AdyAyi9gCeOiHd 0C+/MG5o0n7FW5mQkEl3oMM= =jo5k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--