From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jan 17 14:20: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1123D15051 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:20:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id OAA31908; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:20:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001172220.OAA31908@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Matt of the Long Red Hair Subject: Re: ports/16151: ports update: sysutils/sarah Reply-To: Matt of the Long Red Hair Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/16151; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matt of the Long Red Hair To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/16151: ports update: sysutils/sarah Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:11:56 -0500 (EST) On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > The script 'sarah' hard-codes the following: > > my( $config ) = '/usr/local/etc/sarah.conf'; > > shouldn't this be configurable through ${PREFIX} ? There's no config script for sarah *yet*, unfortunately. I can look at trying to do something funky with the port makefile though, if there's a problem with accepting the port this way. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ``Forum, not tone. That pile question. Whether tip Miller into mind to suffer tie songs and crows oh courageous fortune or to gun and Mar it. - Haircut'' Misinterpretation of "To be or not to be.." by an early model Newton. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message