From nobody Wed Mar 26 10:58:56 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ZN3gh6wgQz5rmQr; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ZN3gh2SDZz3QCH; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:58:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1742986736; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vqu1f2d4OJldKewDIsPyNYLm3lRRQQBelBG9TEZexLg=; b=Du8zgUWBhybppsQZknQmFnjMYmREwTpUxo67bKB5e7TkaLTfqbhYzTe07CKQVSFza1BlyC AwRvOiWbdbTNieLs2pLRW1k/K3gwzc1RO5fdpYa/n8WJOckVk0g5/x6FgMR1p2LF3FgXlp xeK8hbr3XkwT/zdwWPo+Kylts5lEEcEzaFPsIBRwgIaT37mh8eDzTAvHrUPH8PGx6tkxNu HGNA3IWn8rMU7UagSency/SDCv3EqwohKJDk4RRZTE36aUgNu92ud74ibdsXXyvVojX7FG aOShLQMTnX2MeJXX2f/xn9W9dzolVG2yOD/jLZ5toTtB7RSm2g6B6C9v4tvQIw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1742986736; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=sM7NKk+yy2/7kMajhWD0sijNbrcEQj0YpXQyTTr9ZMkqB4qqxE42paWxGJafqNXMubDl3g YJn2fgGH5QX/NmSHQZCKdR74n0/M4SAtQ3PblXLJF4F6pD4yuwLyFIjgamhOJLdG+P4Xc5 50RkwM6p52lkHYJy4/lRXu82XNilQzwfabAd0h6d/fy9PfJoOI1m14dN0rnze4wkSX1ngn sBEpn4jTozqV4AfghobxXqwbQja/bw9V+Yspulgv2dWoemuVzenXiTdegQc+Qvj/JEw4yt YnPr0ht+mdRXnKp6iZQ34AKR+j/L+SDHugBS2yCNSf3RbGzb2uBxEbctcTlfxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1742986736; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vqu1f2d4OJldKewDIsPyNYLm3lRRQQBelBG9TEZexLg=; b=xLjZ9RUfEKNlgvmCrOyOYMRkwQASqZ/xpWaq4jTIhno+m5V8SrbjAmtjqe4A0KBzxGhAcu 9z4K6MJ33/opwnBoOILuf2Z93QNybww2OfE8cPp8MncCnszmh9joyJ8iBSuAmf2RkO3W1x syYCo+aU15RsugH70Xr1EBZ35PmhmDS/YIEPPvA/iujvsv8MbHN3nk8O7KMqGPrTWU8JWg QxRByuxcUGWjfZH6o8u3H4fc5eVgzJriBYdH/Voi3C85sDhd7IbBRBYIuYaDIozzKj0lOz azdMjob24hi7WUw6+iDOUYWvQcUym292iXKY9LVWstMhlafU62nLHD1V254+PA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 3B9B5F1B6; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 10:58:56 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 891000e056fa - main - sysutils/grub2-efi: the port had been improved (+) Message-ID: References: <202502090341.5193fRKa071460@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <59f872eb-bc31-cf66-c054-7b4d7c51e018@pfeifer.com> List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59f872eb-bc31-cf66-c054-7b4d7c51e018@pfeifer.com> On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:37:37AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > sysutils/grub2-efi: the port had been improved (+) > > > > - Replace RUN_DEPENDS manipulation with USE_GCC=yes:build > > Nice. This is why I provide USE_GCC=yes:build. :-) Ah, lovely, appreciated! :) > > - While here, adjust LICENSE and wrap overly long lines > : > > -LICENSE= GPLv3 > > +LICENSE= GPLv3+ > > Good catch. > > The LICENSE adjustment from GPLv3 to GPLv3+ probably warrants > a PORTREVISION bump? I generally try to avoid bumping port revisions, unless there's something severely wrong with the existing package, and I doubt that any of its users care whether it says GPLv3 or later. ./danfe