From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 18:16:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DAB16A4CE; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:16:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D8D43D45; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id iAIIGLkZ083067; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:16:21 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:16:21 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200411181816.iAIIGLkZ083067@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" In-Reply-To: <20041118095710.332b23dd@dolphin.local.net> References: <20041112133305.4b49aa90.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20041116131451.773bcb96@dolphin.local.net> <20041118200050.5ceb1f65.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20041118095710.332b23dd@dolphin.local.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.11 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:16:21 +0900 (JST) cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: nork@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: devel/libgtop2 cannot build X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:16:28 -0000 On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:57:10 -0600 "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > > > /usr/ports/devel/libgtop2/work/libgtop-2.8.1/sysdeps/freebsd, > > > works for me under CURRENT. > > I confirmed that it looks good, by running gnome-system-monior. > > It didn't crash. > Yes, I did the same. The omission of those two assignments seems to do > no harm. Of course, I could be wrong. :-) No problem for me:-). I think this is OK. GNOME maintainers, how about it?