From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 1 23:50:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA22789 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 23:50:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [208.221.12.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA22784 for ; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 23:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA20409; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 23:48:45 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901020748.XAA20409@implode.root.com> To: "Douglas Evan Cook" cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress 100 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 02 Jan 1999 00:22:51 MST." <000101be3620$b4ef7d40$0daf8dd0@dougcook> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 23:48:45 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Is there a serious enough difference between the two to expect this, or Yes, they are completely different and based on different NICs. >Would it be compatible with the EtherExpress Pro/10 (since the network >doesn't support 100 yet, this would be ok)? Is there a driver somewhere >for the regular EtherExpress Pro/100? Or am I just up a creek? No. No. Yes. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message