From owner-freebsd-net Fri Mar 26 8:17:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from maxwell.syr.edu (maxwell.syr.edu [128.230.129.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B886915657 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 08:17:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cmsedore@maxwell.syr.edu) Received: from exchange.maxwell.syr.edu (exchange.maxwell.syr.edu [128.230.129.241]) by maxwell.syr.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA00895 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:04:26 GMT Received: by exchange.maxwell.syr.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:17:20 -0500 Message-ID: <262C3DA9BE0CD211971700A0C9B413A1CBEF@exchange.maxwell.syr.edu> From: Christopher Sedore To: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: bpf bug? Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 11:17:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I noticed today that when sending a packet through the bpf interface, the kernel silently resets the ethernet source MAC to the MAC of the network card doing the send. My impression was that bpf writes should go direct to the interface without any edits in the kernel--am I wrong on this? -Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message