From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Jan 27 09:11:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F58AA6E6B5; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78EC6198F; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:11:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (248.Red-83-39-200.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.39.200.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D351E43BB9; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 03:11:21 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r407270 - head/ports-mgmt/portmaster To: Colin Percival , koobs@FreeBSD.org References: <201601261123.u0QBNcvL091258@repo.freebsd.org> <56A86CAD.7030507@marino.st> <56A8747E.5080703@FreeBSD.org> <20160127081700.GA20812@FreeBSD.org> <56A87FCE.6080305@FreeBSD.org> <00000152824dfd5d-8dd9701f-68f8-4224-b6ae-bd72619f0b4c-000000@email.amazonses.com> <56A887BE.7000707@marino.st> <0000015282582a9f-fdf38a51-5c81-4807-b26b-5c4f59946307-000000@email.amazonses.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, "svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org" , "svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org" Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <56A889B8.1050601@marino.st> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:11:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0000015282582a9f-fdf38a51-5c81-4807-b26b-5c4f59946307-000000@email.amazonses.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:11:24 -0000 On 1/27/2016 10:09 AM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 01/27/16 01:02, John Marino wrote: > > Personally, I think being flooded with people who want to maintain portmaster > would be a great problem to have. > >> Whomever maintains portmaster needs to be vetted for qualification (or >> better yet, fix it before taking over the port to prove they can) > > Someone submitting a bug report saying "I'd like to maintain portmaster" > doesn't mean that we automatically need to set them as the maintainer. I'm guessing you don't process a lot of PRs. :)