Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:31:04 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 233260] [PATCH] deskutils/nextcloudclient: Update to 2.5.0
Message-ID:  <bug-233260-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233260

            Bug ID: 233260
           Summary: [PATCH] deskutils/nextcloudclient: Update to 2.5.0
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: mr@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: madpilot@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(mr@FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: mr@FreeBSD.org

Created attachment 199282
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D199282&action=
=3Dedit
patch

Hi,

I've created n update to nextcloudclient to recently released 2.5.0.

Unluckily this version strictly requires OpenSSL 1.1.0. This means it can w=
ork
only on 12.0 and up or 11.2 with openssl installed from ports.

Due to this I'm just proposing this patch but at present I will not commit =
it
even in case of timeout, since I think the maintainer should choose how to =
deal
with this.

While updating it I made a few minor changes to please portlint.

I also changed the way DEBUG is manged. It's preferred not to expose it as =
an
option, but to conditionally enable required flags when WITH_DEBUG is enabl=
ed.

BTW there is no compatibility layer anymore between WITH_DEBUG and the DEBUG
option, so to get proper debugging code (not stripped) it is required to ha=
ve
extra logic anyway.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233260-7788>