From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 2 20:26:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA15667 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 2 May 1998 20:26:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA15651 for ; Sat, 2 May 1998 20:26:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA21542; Sat, 2 May 1998 20:24:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 20:24:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Jeff Ehrenkrantz cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: possible netmask problem 2nd pass In-Reply-To: <001101bd7478$98ae4fe0$3042f5cf@tvmaster1.whyy.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Jeff Ehrenkrantz wrote: > >> inet 207.8.142.145 netmask 0xffffffff > > >No, take out this alias. A loopback route will be added automatically. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Well bummers this output is from the ifconfig -a not what i plunked into > rc.conf. > but just to make certain i removed the netmask from the rc.conf anyway . > Here is the clip from rc.conf and output as a result. > network_interfaces="ed0 lo0" # List of network interfaces (lo0 is loopback). > ifconfig_ed0="inet 207.8.142.138 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" # default loopback device configuration. Comment out this line: > ifconfig_lo0_alias0="inet 207.8.142.145" # Sample alias entr Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message