From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec  3 11:12:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247FB37B405
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  3 Dec 2001 11:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from caddis.yogotech.com (caddis.yogotech.com [206.127.123.130])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA02907;
	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:12:06 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate@yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by caddis.yogotech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB3JC6U39979;
	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:12:06 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate)
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15371.52869.791002.21216@caddis.yogotech.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 12:12:05 -0700
To: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@soco.agilent.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Subject: Re: Found the problem, w/patch (was Re: FreeBSD performing worse than Linux?)
In-Reply-To: <200112031909.LAA22042@mina.soco.agilent.com>
References: <bulk.92884.20011130162313@hub.freebsd.org>
	<200112031909.LAA22042@mina.soco.agilent.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > Unfortunately, I'm unable to run tcpdump on the client, since it's
> > running NT and we're not allowed to install any 3rd party apps on it
> > (such as the WinDump package).
> 
>      NT???  You wouldn't happen to be seeing performance problems with
> Samba, I hope?

We're not using Samba over 100's of miles. :)

> There are some known Samba/FreeBSD issues that can cause
> abysmal performance (~30-40KB/sec -- yes, "kilobytes/sec"), even with
> 100BT cards.

This may be due to problems that Matt Dillon just recently fixed this
weekend in FreeBSD's TCP/IP stack.



Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message