From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 08:50:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216581065674; Thu, 15 May 2008 08:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8018FC0A; Thu, 15 May 2008 08:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EEC108D8E; Thu, 15 May 2008 04:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 May 2008 04:50:11 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: XPx5MkqR3sAE6IgP0ktPsbv9XwRZu4U7QyZpn8jPgLmF 1210841410 Received: from empiric.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39F2F1E82; Thu, 15 May 2008 04:50:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <482BF941.30108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:50:09 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080514) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnn@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed patch to the kernel and to netstat... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 08:50:12 -0000 gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > ... > Please email me comments. I'd like to commit this to HEAD soon. It > can't be put into 7 without removing the cluster and mbuf counting, > but I might do that as well if there is interest. > People writing servers are going to find the watermark stuff useful. I'm thinking being able to watch the the buffer stats (possibly also in a way which we can graph) for a single socket, given its inpcb or so address, would also be a neat trick... cheers BMS