From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 2 10:31:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA00687 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 10:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sumatra.americantv.com (sumatra.americantv.com [207.170.17.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA00679 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 10:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from right.PCS (right.PCS [148.105.10.31]) by sumatra.americantv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA29422; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 13:03:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: (jlemon@localhost) by right.PCS (8.6.13/8.6.4) id MAA08124; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 12:32:47 -0500 Message-ID: <19970602123247.21415@right.PCS> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 12:32:47 -0500 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Brandon Gillespie Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why routed and not gated by default? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.61.1 In-Reply-To: ; from Brandon Gillespie on Jun 06, 1997 at 10:13:57AM -0600 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Jun 06, 1997 at 10:13:57AM -0600, Brandon Gillespie wrote: > > Perhaps we don't use gated by default due to copyright problems? Bingo. Cornell restricts redistribution of GateD. However, on re-reading the license, it seems that there is a provision which allows redistribution to third parties. Perhaps Cornell would permit either Walnut Creek or FreeBSD, Inc to redistribute gated? Or has this already been considered, and turned down? -- Jonathan