From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 12:13:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2507416A416; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) From: David Xu To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 20:12:40 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <20060703101554.Q26325@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060703101554.Q26325@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607032012.40374.davidxu@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: threads@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:13:04 -0000 On Monday 03 July 2006 17:30, Robert Watson wrote: > If we're going to think about this seriously for 7.0, increasing libthr > exposure sooner rather than later is probably a good idea. > > Robert N M Watson > Computer Laboratory > University of Cambridge I think libthr should be default thread library. David Xu