From owner-freebsd-scsi  Tue Feb  8 16:50:20 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05C2440F
	for <scsi@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  8 Feb 2000 14:21:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04912;
	Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:18:30 -0800
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:18:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com>
Cc: Gerard Roudier <groudier@club-internet.fr>, scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Rescan for Devices...
In-Reply-To: <200002081946.MAA44745@narnia.plutotech.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002081418030.80994-100000@semuta.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



> > In my opinion, It is minimal convenience for a SCSI BUS scan to ensure
> > deterministic device ordering.
> 
> And I would certainly agree with this.  It is not too hard to do and will
> be done.  Where's my PR? 8-)

The same place it was when I told *you* about this issue 6 months ago....




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message