Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:15:24 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files kern.pre.mk src/sys/dev/em LICENSE e1000_80003es2lan.c e1000_80003es2lan.h e1000_82540.c e1000_82541.c e1000_82541.h e1000_82542.c e1000_82543.c e1000_82543.h e1000_82571.c e1000_82571.h e1000_82575.c ... Message-ID: <86d4vspk8j.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <47073AF5.1010109@samsco.org> (Scott Long's message of "Sat\, 06 Oct 2007 01\:36\:21 -0600") References: <200710052249.l95Mn9Nb071852@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071005231538.GA24016@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <2a41acea0710051705l217224b6vc705dc6139b94e3b@mail.gmail.com> <20071006004634.GA24962@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <47073AF5.1010109@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> writes: > What do you expect to accomplish by lecturing a vendor who has shown > very good faith over the years in supporting FreeBSD? Maybe we should > tell Intel to piss off since you obviously know how to support their > hardware much better than they do. We used to have a principle that commit bits were granted to individuals on their individual merit, not simply because they represented a vendor and were paid to work on drivers for that vendor's hardware. We also used to have a principle that changes should be tested before being committed, especially to -STABLE. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86d4vspk8j.fsf>