From nobody Tue Apr 19 19:05:59 2022 X-Original-To: toolchain@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782671370585 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KjYDT27tnz4bgW for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A7F2CEAC for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 23JJ61Oh037511 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:06:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 23JJ61DY037510 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:06:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261977] lang/gcc12-devel: enable LTO Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:05:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pkubaj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD s integrated toolchain List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-toolchain List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1650395161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BULwNJFM/KG2iLUGSaG0AGta/ghZ9iKbOP4Doi30Gqs=; b=LI+2CzNMgvnZpYPNOMDsS7r0pL+IHrbOO7wa2ZZaFVG0nzc0nfFa3Jz3pUbdVabVreBds9 LZWPRIumEwXxCylFr6yFPyk+IQFXZ1XrOQ8ng6nEIRmn8WvR5/RP1qs1WfYLaWw2xPGCYP 7abLm53HeyaiT/I7vmOL+VcaUWvCh5+OrUiOxeyGO4vaq84hZ0b345fzldEtxoyWgH5i8B wl5bO7oBszabOuelYv+JYPqrrj2ugqK9QAiLk2xw+H6N2R9sjT7ICO2lj8617BKD/YEdwy rB/+baLdEc93Pn8Cr7OUk5SxF1p7B0Wc20jpRVgeNsUc79CjVEWFENNDeH3/KQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1650395161; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IpbHdbEcmYqOsoq/xlllu+yyEhoD7xFiV2iFsrcUc9S3TiqtbR0QD4aloPEZPoBjXQbD/M FI93h5NJG4/1eqK7oiviqECuXi4oC4Ohl4ykSEUEWwf4z2DU0d+T9bjsk4i/kFxoTl6jwD LqlCeyrPwl5ygdlJjzAG0BSStJ0nz4T2YrukOtEIN/mrL07hpNiMBTP7yzKbySCo01W+Wj /I0kqVlJuW3zs1jpUOU1QfZhT/mbGasP3AtvOLU/ayiFRdGyDi6C/HSzP4JL2G6eoojZCG wu7e/W6pfYdRxSmm7E0EhgdT4JwLeZemJKi7UtC3DWnNTp1dwr9BVmUjPA+iCQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261977 --- Comment #25 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #21) An interesting property of the criteria suggestion is: How much value is there for more frequent package update releases vs. less frequent package releases for the actual timescale difference involved from before any gcc LTO builds to now with 3 gcc LTO builds (gcc11, gcc11-devel, and gcc12-devel)? A quick set of data could be to look up some 30,000+ port bulk -a runs on amd64 and aarch64 (tier 1's) in the time frames and see if the total time is significantly different and by how much. A complication is the currently-frequent build failures for aarch64 building gcc12-devel for NOHANG_TIME and/or MAX_EXECUTION_TIME . One might have to search for a successful case to have a reasonable comparison (approximating "as if the timeouts were longer"). An incompleteness in the comparison could be the status of gcc1 being the default vs. not. Once default, more things will wait on its build. Exp-run like test of default gcc11? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=