From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 22:26:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC808E225E2 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E247EAD4; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id w204so17032958ywg.3; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:26:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=KOqNl+q+l8hvdASilcCYf0sNjd7wewWS4nuR+hUoQ9Q=; b=lOEgx82QiAAc7NMe7R+vhbBBZ12nfQottfBf9Gtl9ubzuqwtnNl9x+ID5cpeF2f0vc JwE1F0YPwYaOm+XLVN9j3Z3ZDLmmCbI2hF4pJgudeUfiTmkh5giakiQqq9AlCRe4+hvo oFkmtQSByEdHiV8039YwQjJPkIQPkMxjFTT4RhdxVgaUSLUIBwTJXtxJfs0nbEkVjESE AFg5Lg5lNJIOisEZ0q9mrBZsLpy8WZ9Z4Cl+QlSxTm58RcuL9jf52LttLNc6Uoe3jNns yLKaaBOx+vju0Vj+ctOMns1Ze6YtsSzHKzFNfsqmi4GmlrBpOw/W8z4PEq9hziueFPOE jaaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KOqNl+q+l8hvdASilcCYf0sNjd7wewWS4nuR+hUoQ9Q=; b=ncGgZhEr6mPP//p8oRMiNermzv6QN8Sy/7bNCPvn74p3+Yot3ej7WWXZODohX+fBue 9mzZT4N4KlVxy6MyHv397dYzIdu1Mt2vepsujMrKfAqjmvMtN1AQ76E5xPj9NcN2Ct5t RtNmGMIoZ0k7DDa3ZemmBpCXSPQEDLKP9Laz5wyMnQJ7T4QrKXBb1Hs1Pgx27ZMvTvAK pl+Y217MCyPaerxYwS5TCsfEJ1ZCFzJAFl//0ezD7IRpeeEHxWuuxjKtoTEi2sja/AEI 5poqcku+yx3Odh6cBvVX19Bjczx9ZKqZ9di1jLTeBNL7rAVpvXshBBlja3OA3GmqO8z6 Z+eA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUin61+h0efrvL0Px6xxEz2+Vulu++TRnSaaseh30+u8qflCtTaG ns0UmHMSbC57TgvGtlFLKwjXR+4SAw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb6VjDemKlHhKsVG5lIuqBg76FRPQ683Iv9GEyYhqP/sDKJq4pEe2ccNZT4IvbCf+QJ3F5X2RBsxvkJfd1wdgsc= X-Received: by 10.37.206.204 with SMTP id x195mr481183ybe.33.1504650407603; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:26:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.129.125.65 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:26:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ATFx9DedVLTRLLYN7XsWkbfLsc0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RSS_UDP_IPV4_EX? To: Sepherosa Ziehau Cc: "Robert N. M. Watson" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:26:50 -0000 Please do! -a On 3 September 2017 at 17:48, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >> My recollection here is (quite) hazy, as it's been a while, but it's likely >> that this was a transcription error. The set of hash types was largely >> modelled on what Chelsio offered in the T3 (if I recall), and also what was >> documented in the Microsoft RSS white paper, so it may be worth taking a >> look at those sources to see if something makes itself obvious. >> >> (There do seem to be some odd variations in hashing types supported by >> various NICs -- e.g., hashing but with different hash algorithms in certain >> generations of cards, etc, so it also wouldn't surprise me if it did >> correspond to something real. Clearly the comment is not good enough to >> explain that, if so!) > > I checked latest RSS updates from Microsoft. There is no such type. > But they did add UDP_IP4, UDP_IPV6 and UDP_IPV6_EX. I am going to > whack UDP_IPV4_EX and update various comment. I will setup a review > soon. > > Thanks, > sephe > >> >> Robert >> >> On 2 Sep 2017, at 00:43, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I seem to recall it was something some chipsets supported? I forget the >> details. >> >> >> >> -adrian >> >> >> On 30 August 2017 at 00:07, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: >>> >>> IPv4 UDP with extended headers o_O? Or it was just a mistake. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> sephe >>> >>> -- >>> Tomorrow Will Never Die >> >> >> > > > > -- > Tomorrow Will Never Die