From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 30 14:13:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1398A16A4CE; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:13:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from hudson.icann.org (hudson.icann.org [192.0.35.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECE443D45; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:13:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@dougbarton.net) Received: from dougbarton.net ([192.168.168.1]) by hudson.icann.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBUMCxp10006; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:12:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3FF1F86B.4010802@dougbarton.net> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:12:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bruce A. Mah" References: <200312302028.hBUKSN3N039265@repoman.freebsd.org> <3FF1E180.7020204@dougbarton.net> <20031230203717.GA37201@intruder.kitchenlab.org> In-Reply-To: <20031230203717.GA37201@intruder.kitchenlab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ICANN-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@icann.org for more information X-ICANN-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:13:09 -0000 Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Doug Barton wrote: > >>Bruce A. Mah wrote: >> >>>bmah 2003/12/30 12:28:23 PST >>> >>> FreeBSD doc repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors chapter.sgml >>> Log: >>> s/seriously critical fixes/critical fixes/ >>> >>> In the descriptions of the release branches, "seriously" modified the >>> word "critical", which doesn't make much sense in this context. >> >>I think that the humorously critical fixes are getting a raw deal here... > > > Surely you can't be serious. :-) Don't call me Shirley. :) Doug