From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 9 12:54:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A24116A41F; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FF043D79; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:54:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k59CsKui086886; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:54:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:33:11 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060609095103.GA15857@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060609095103.GA15857@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606090833.12159.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 09 Jun 2006 08:54:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1523/Fri Jun 9 03:10:10 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Lars Koeller , lars.koeller@uni-bielefeld.de Subject: Re: Bug Report kern/98694 (please help) X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 12:54:24 -0000 On Friday 09 June 2006 05:51, Lars Koeller wrote: > > Dear experts, > > please can you have a look at the bug report mentioned above? > > We have seven machines of this type running, serving more > than 30.000 users with spam and virus scanning. I just updated the > bug report. > > We have s short timeline, cause the new infrastructure in our data center > should be go online soon. No we hit this bug/problem in FBSD 5.4/5.5. > > Sophos only supports FBSD 5 now, so we have no posibility to play around > with 6.1. > > It would be very nice if someone could give us som support, to fix the problem. > > Many thanks and best regards The clock handling changes in 6 that would fix your problem are too big to backport to 5.x I'm afraid. I can look at your panic in the non-ACPI case if you can capture a dmesg with ACPI disabled (including the panic messages) over a serial console. -- John Baldwin