Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:50:21 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Markus Brueffer <markus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/dcgui Makefile distinfo ports/net/dcgui/files patch-main.cpp Message-ID: <20040227215021.GA25978@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1077915957.39459.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> References: <200402271506.i1RF6EPV053698@green.homeunix.org> <1077894594.9195.25.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040227205550.GA24693@xor.obsecurity.org> <1077915957.39459.7.camel@hood.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:05:57PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V p?, 27. 02. 2004 v 21:55, Kris Kennaway p??e: >=20 > > > > > > > > does not install tehm. And dclib seems to install also:=20 > > > > > > > > +@dirrm share/nls/en_US.US-ASCII=20 > > > > > > > > +@dirrm share/nls/POSIX > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > DON'T! ever add these lines to port's pkg-plist. These are pa= rt of > > > > > > > system hierarchy and shall not be ever removed. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > < BIG UPS > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > It seems a little odd to me, but that's what=20 > > > > > > /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/plist produced. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Don't blindly trust some script. It obviously needs to be updated. > > > >=20 > > > > What is the script doing wrong, exactly? There's no references to = share/nls/ > > > > in any of the system mtree files, so they cannot be part of the hie= rarchy > > > > that the script knows about. > > >=20 > > > Yes, your script is correct, Brian. It's BSD.local.mtree what needs to > > > be updated. > >=20 > > These are symlinks and cannot be listed in mtree files. That's why > > they're created by bsd.port.mk instead. >=20 > And now the good news - symlinks can be listed in and created from mtree > files. I have a patch for BSD.local.mtree ready waiting for green to > approve it. Why does this apparently work now but not a few months ago when ports/53189 was submitted? I have the feeling something is missing here. Kris --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAP7udWry0BWjoQKURApikAJ486KR8LA1Fx8tGcCGmrIgGlT+g7ACgwyUl eJlcbvfiDjQSwWS1xPc48ms= =Ji22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040227215021.GA25978>