From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 21 20:54:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B487816A404 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:54:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2953013C478 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from speedtoys.racing@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so812198uge for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:54:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RDkLuea8TAExqH+xc6NbLvcM0qI0Lbb/PDx/lVIO8yXiNc4Ozw0M1ujM5DcMLre4IRcVgGmLVbIneP2xeHTjlL2YJ9rv1+DeyTtMlPKYgMwydF2xEj4RAdGncaTShvf7LR1Icd48wPf56mL5rtMBsnjtm44MGDfI4okErT2aE2U= Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr5202913bue.1169412880587; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.141.18 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 12:54:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 11:54:40 -0900 From: "Jeff Mohler" To: "Christian Baer" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: more than 7 partitions on a SCSI-drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:54:42 -0000 Ive never understood why we still partition drives so much..its one spindle..sure, a hige filesystem might cause an edge performance issue..but..its one spindle. / works. ? If there is a fundamental reason why we still partition things like we only have 10, 20, or 40Mb RLL. or slightly larger ESDI drives from back in the day..im willing to learn. On 1/21/07, Christian Baer wrote: > Hi folkes! > > Is there any way to do this with FreeBSD? > > Background: > > I have to admit, that I have never actually done or even tried this with > any OS whatsoever. I am running a two drive system with two mirrors on > it. Because I wanted a lot of room for /usr while /usr/home ist mounted > on a different partition, the second drive is filled with the two > mirror partitions, /usr and a swap partition. Everything else is mounted > on the first drive. That being: /, /temp, /var, /usr/obj and the second > swap partition. Together with the two mirrors this means seven (in > words: 7) partitions. The table looks like this: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0a 501M 72M 389M 16% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/da0d 1.9G 102K 1.8G 0% /tmp > /dev/da1f 21G 2.9G 17G 15% /usr > /dev/da0h 6.8G 742M 5.5G 12% /usr/obj > /dev/da0e 4.8G 71M 4.4G 2% /var > /dev/mirror/sec1.eli 9.8G 7.5M 9.0G 0% /usr/home > /dev/mirror/sec0.eli 34G 21M 32G 0% /usr/home/christian > > What really sounds (and probably is) pathetic is that I have nearly 6 > gigs of 'leftover' space on da0. Increasing the size of the mounted > partitions isn't really useful anymore (apart from reducing the free > space) as I for example probably won't be needing 2GB for /temp or more > than 5GB for /var - those are the sizes I have allocated now. Making / > any bigger than the current 512MB wouldn't bring any advances either. > > Increasing the size of the mirrors isn't an option because that would be > schrinking /usr. Finding a new mount point wouldn't be a problem. I was > thinking something along the lines of /usr/ports. /usr/src was an idea > at first but since I want to keep that on a different physical drive > than /usr/obj, the idea doesn't seem that bright anymore. > > But the > problem is that I can't allocate another partition, not that I ran out > of ideas for mount points. :-) On other machines with IDE-drives I had > one slice with partitions inside and never ran into this limitation > before. Is there any way to do something like that on SCSI-drives? We > are talking about SPARC64 here. > > Regards > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >