From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Apr 27 15:17:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from privatecube.privatelabs.com (privatecube.privatelabs.com [63.114.185.254])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6A47A37B423; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.privatelabs.com)
Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (root@misha.plten [10.0.0.106])
	by privatecube.privatelabs.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03209;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:38:11 -0400
Received: from misha.privatelabs.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by misha.privatelabs.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3RMHOC77541;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from mi@misha.privatelabs.com)
Message-Id: <200104272217.f3RMHOC77541@misha.privatelabs.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:17:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: mi@aldan.algebra.com
Subject: Re: maxing out the 100Mb TX (full duplex)
To: Jonathan Fortin <jfortin@akalink.com>, ahl@austclear.com.au,
	brooks@one-eyed-alien.net
Cc: questions@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <002d01c0cedf$76c932e0$0200320a@node00>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 27 Apr, Jonathan Fortin wrote:
= Hello,
= 
= You can do  etherchannel on freebsd with ng_one2many. Man  it for more
= information, but briefly,
=
= It is used to load balance incoming and outgoing data in a round robin
= fashion across the interfaces that are added on the "hook".

Ok,  the switch  does support  EtherChannel (calling  it "aggregation").
Now, should  we try the wpaul's  fec or the ng_one2many?  And what's the
difference? Thanks a lot for your time, gentlemen!

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message